What vkng stock manipulator needs to know

We are who gave him the power on which he
depends to put his conditions and play his
games here.I am not referring to the
part he got with his deception.I am referring
to the tolerance and patience we or at least I
willingly gave him after recognizing the first
part of his plan(Midsummer's fake buyback)trying
to be more forgiving.

It is not my nature not to pursue my rights
in a situation like that no matter what kind
of temptation the other side might offer.
I made an exception in this case trying
to be more forgiving where I usually insist
on my rights.Unfortunately I chose the wrong
subject to practice that with.What I did here
was 180 degrees away from what my usual response
would be and I forced it on myself.

Anyway,in the coming period he and whoever
helped him will see better my usual response
to an encroachment on my rights like this.

Law enforcement is between me and him plus
his gang (including those corrupt SEC officials
who contacted me trying to serve him).

The Power Of A Psychotic Personality Assumption

Dealing with someone with a psychotic mental
set like this guy is very easy and extremely
hard at the same time.

It is very easy if one try to base his judgment
entirely on facts and materials in the outside wold.
In this case it is clear that what the VKNG guy is doing
and has done here is irrational.Based on that,one
would know whether really helping this guy would
be by granting his requests or by being an additional
force helping those inside him which are very overwhelmed
by his psychotic desire.

Now one might ask:But what if there is some rational
explanation for what I saw as irrational?

My response is this is much more of a theoretical
question than one for actual situations.I think that
in many -if not most- situations ,including this one,
things are very clear to a normal person.In fact I think
that it is much more probable to misjudge the irrational
as rational than it is the other way around.

In addition,I ask the one who put such question:
If you cant see the rational explanations and what
support their existence then why doesn't the burden
of showing that fall on the one doing those actions?
Why doesn't the one with the questionable actions show
the rationality in his behavior?He should show that
with facts and materials and not through the personality
he may assume (and I cant stress that enough for the
point below).

On the other hand if one try to make his judgment
about the rationality of some actions based on the
personality a psychotic person may assume to shield
his true self and mislead others thinking he can easily
distinguish genuine behavior from a misleading one then
he is very very far from knowing what he is getting himself
into.

A psychotic person may assume a personality that is
contrary to his situation and actions to an unimaginable
level.Any difference in that personality from a real one(one
which really fits the situation) cant be seen even with a
microscope.That power could be the result of him constructing his
own reality.I think that -like me-when one discovers for
the first time this kind of assuming a contrary personality
by a psychotic he would discover with it the level of reality
acknowledgment inside people which we take for granted and
which a psychotic person discovered before us.

A psychotic person can see you in the street,punch you in the
face and make you bleed then the second day he would assume
being a victim and show helplessness enough to  convince you
 that he is the victim and make you worry  about him instead of
 yourself  and offer yourself to be punched  again if that may reduce
 the agony he is showing.

His Majesty The Psychotic

The whole world came to the service of this vkng psychotic
and granting him his wish to deny an event that has
no big effect on him other than to show he is not
always in control.Unfortunately,that also include
me.Although My mistake doesn't involve the legal
violations for which he is currently holding his
own friends as hostages just to satisfy that psychotic
need.

Everything connect very strongly to make one picture
and only one and it is of that psychotic need for
denial as the reason for this guy action here.
The guy needs to be controlled and restricted by
the outside because his psychotic wish is not allowing
him to control himself.The last position this guy need
to be in here is of the one calling the shots even if for
nothing more than his own safety.

A response to one of vkng manipulator "bashing" posts

Believe it or not that is still less agitating
to me than when you put your conditions for
the stock to move up.In fact I sometimes even
get close to wishing that we do not receive
anything that satisfy your condition and in
turn satisfy your delusional control over reality.
But I try to resist that since we should not damage
ourselves just to oppose your psychotic behavior.
The mistake was allowing you the opportunity to do
and continue this fraud from the beginning.But one
thing you should know is that you did not succeed
in doing that through your price temptation.No,you
deceived me with your psychotic way.You showed need
and humility which mislead one to think that it
contradict arrogance against reality.But the fact
is that it is the need to maintain a psychotic
arrogance against something in reality that pushed
for such need and desperation.Someone not psychotic
might think the need side might defeat the purpose
of the arrogant side.The psychotic person,on the other
hand,is very capable of this separation and act as if
he deals with two separate worlds or realities

I like how things work with that "Affiliate"

It remind me of how things work in a cartoon.
So just like when in the cartoon one run past a cliff
but doesn't fall until he look down and see the space
below him,that "affiliate" was allowed to sell (according
to the claim) until he noticed his being affiliate.

Let those helping VKNG defrauder remember this:

A car could be driven by one person.But when it makes
an accident it would make it to everyone inside.

Just something to consider while they let this drunk
driver lead their vehicle here.

Their Cat Can Quack

Also from the recent 10Q

"It is our understanding that, upon notice from

us to sell shares to Dutchess under the
Investment Agreement, Dutchess begins selling
shares in the open market and does not
typically hold the shares purchased from us."

So they expected it to quack but still thought
of it as a cat?

This kind of understanding does not fit even
the shortest term traders.It fits only someone
who is just acting as a medium to transfer
shares.In other words part in the already
known plan here.

That Big Dead Animal

Actually I wouldn't be surprised if it was
Midsummer who asked or suggested directly
or indirectly for insiders to write and defend
them.The main manipulator tried to use the
trust one generally assume in the SEC before
this.So it is not quite a stretch to think
the same method might be attempted through
the company this time.

I am not saying this just because it is a
possibility.Instead,there were somewhat
suspicious things like that forced grouping
of an insider (Bopp) and Midsummer in
the same paragraph.It sounded as if someone
wanted to defend Midsummer by associating them
with the insiders (real ones not SEC insiders)
so that our faith in them spread to Midsummer.

In any case,anyone try to fight for Midsummer
in the debate and argument field is fighting
a losing battle and I think I still can show
the picture better and better.

It is my words against the main manipulator's
financial power.So while I may not be able to
cause the SEC to abandon its corruption sufficiently
enough to really act on this case,his financial power
has no value in the debate and argument field.

There is a big dead animal here and whoever cant
smell that need his nose checked by a professional.
We sensed the stink long time ago and declared that
then gave extra time of more than 100 days for the
manipulator but he refused to abandon his plan although
he saw his violation being a public knowledge.

Not Just Spineless But We Can Write Trash As Well!

That  seems to be what the company is saying through
its action about this matter when they talked about it
in their recent filing:

"Midsummer Investment, Ltd invested in us prior to the January 2008 recapitalization and made an additional investment in connection with our recapitalization. As a result of those investments, as of December 24, 2009, based on a Schedule 13G filed by Midsummer with the SEC on December 24, 2009, Midsummer holds 8,344,619 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 5,551,034 shares at $0.18 per share. In November 2009, Midsummer had reported in filings with the SEC that they sold 2,289,417 shares of our common stock. As further reported in Forms 4 filed by Midsummer with the SEC in December 2009, due to volume limitations on selling restricted securities held by affiliates, Midsummer’s broker was required to repurchase the majority of these shares and restore them to Midsummer’s account. The repurchased shares are part of the total of 8,344,619 as reported. As of July 31, 2010, Midsummer has not made any additional filings with the SEC regarding their ownership of our equity securities and we therefore believe they continue to hold the same number of shares and warrants as reported in December 2009.


The common stock and related warrants owned by both (a name we do not need here) and Midsummer are not registered for resale with the SEC. Due to this, combined with each party’s affiliate status, both parties are currently limited in their ability to sell our common stock into the market to 1 percent of the outstanding common stock during any 90 day period. For example, one percent of the 53,772,055 shares outstanding as of July 31, 2010 would be 537,720 shares per 90 day period...Midsummer, in our opinion, is an affiliate solely because of the size of its holding. As of the date of this filing, Midsummer has no current relationship with the Company other than as an arm’s-length investor. "


Lets start first by saying they did not even get
the numbers right.The number of shares sold by
Midsummer was 2428000 not "2,289,417".Second,they
reported buying back all of them and not "the majority
of these shares".They did not even get that right.
One could go back to the selling and buyback filings
and add the numbers himself.

In addition how come they were allowed to sell
shares in excess of the allowed amount according
to that "affiliates" restriction to begin with?That just
added another question here instead of an answer.

And if that "affiliates" restriction was the reason
for the buyback then why did they claim buying back
even the amount of shares they were allowed to sell
according to that restriction?

Who agreed to sell them that amount of shares
at that time?Where and when did the related
transactions happened?How much did they pay
for them?

If finding someone willing to let go of his
shares at that time was that easy,why did the
stock was sold with naked shorting because of
a lack of available shares for borrowing and
remained all that time on the SHO list?

The contradictions are filling the room here.

There are also many things which could fit
that their selling really happened but there
is none for their claimed buyback.
Moreover,the stock remained on the SHO list
for a long time then exitted without any noticeable
buying of shares to be delivered.So,one could believe
in that buying back and he would need to explain it
in addition to explaining that SHO list thing.He
would end up with two unexplainable things.Or one
can combine its being fake with that SHO list
thing and end up with zero things to explain.

So in short,believing in that buyback would
leave so many scattered unanswered questions
while not attempting to deny how fake it sounded
answers those questions and shows a connected
picture.That would become especially true when one
extends his vision to the complete thing including
the signed financing deal and attempt to see the
whole picture and how things would fit altogether
there.

Finally I say here the same thing I wrote to the
SEC.This buyback filing is one the biggest filing
jokes the SEC has ever received.Yet they insisted
on continuing to abuse us with that defrauding trick
in spite of giving them months and months of time.
They might have filled the gap with real shares
from Dutchess (directly or indirectly) by now but
I think there is still a big probability that tracing
that those shares came much later than when they
claimed that buyback is an attainable task.

Going after the crime or the gang?

While I am still at the beginning of my attempt to cause

the SEC to be at least not as corrupt and shameless to

a level of not reacting to the clear outrageous fraud

that happened here,there is a related dimension I haven't

entered yet.That dimension concerns the cooperation with

the one who singed the financing deal with the company

but goes beyond this case.That is because there are many

similar deals signed by that same entity with other companies

and the thought of unholy alliance with the main manipulator

of vkng is unavoidable.That alliance consist of one partner

enticing companies by financing deals that allow them to sell

at future unknown prices whenever they want and as much

as they want while the other partner maintain the pressure

on the price inside the market and  create fakely inflated volume

(which permits the selling of more shares by the company) whenever

 he wants.

Clearly we seem to have a gang here and not just a crime.

THE CORRUPTION BEYOND BELIEF INSIDE THE SEC

(The following paragraphs are selected from emails I sent
that entity itself regarding the subject)

In 2006,after I submitted a complaint through the email about
one of the big guys manipulation of a stock(ticker:BITS),I noticed
that he became aware of my email address and my name.That
in addition to other things made the conclusion that he has
a leaking source inside the SEC to inform him of complaints
related to him unavoidable.But it seems that even at this
level I only scratched the surface of the corruption there.

Starting from 26 April 2010 I began submitting complaints
using the forms on the SEC web site about the very special
violation related to a stock with the ticker VKNG.They were
related to the same big guy.But this time having someone
to tell him about the existence of complaints related to
him inside the SEC was not enough for him.He to my surprise
wasn't only trying to avoid any investigation from the SEC,
he more than that used the SEC for his service.For in Tuesday
the eight of June 2010 I received An Email from the SEC office
in New York asking me for a phone meeting with them to discuss
my complaints.That trick did not last one day on me and by the
end of that day I recognized that the intention is to check
things and extract information from me to serve that big guy
and not the other way around.But the first thing I thought about
was that the email address ending with @sec.gov I received could
be an old email I received and the manipulator had someone inside
who can use it without being noticed by others.That is because I
couldn't even imagine such level of corruption.But to my surprise
the investor advocacy office at the SEC confirmed the name in that
email as someone working in SEC new york office.They also confirmed
the phone number in that email.I spent the following two days making
sure of the sender of that email and the ones which followed really
work for the SEC office in New York before I agreed to that meeting
which happened at Friday 1 pm eastern time.

It is not like they were partly slanted toward the big guy.They
were totally on his side,working for him and did the whole thing
for him.Their corruption percentage is 100 percent.In other words,
if my complaint was assigned to them then I would expect them wanting
to work against this big guy as much as he would want to work against
himself.

The complaint I keep referring to are a series of complaints
and updates regarding a stock with the symbol vkng which
I started sending the SEC from 4/26/10.There are about five
of them until now but I don't know why investor advocacy
office at the SEC said they can find only one of them.

That makes me worried that my complaint are being prevented
from even reaching the destinations it should reach let alone
being investigated.

There is a huge level of manipulation in the world of micro/nano
cap stocks.But unlike my 2006 complaint this one is about a very
special violation and defrauding for share holders.Big manipulators
with what could be billions of financial power built through out the
passing of time a barrier and shield to protect them from being
really investigated.I am not speaking about the like of Goldman
Sach;I don't know about that.My experience is related to the big guys
usually working these micro/nano cap stocks and usually fall between
us and such a big firms.They seem to have the field wide open for
their games and can build such secretive protective layers.

One might think that corruption inside the SEC happens
at most at some individual level working secretly for
the benefit of some entity.But the reality is that the
SEC is so corrupt that those people whom I had the phone
meeting with were working as a group for that big guy as
if it is their usual main task there.

Initially I wanted to point out some of the signs regarding
that but I think the whole thing and the way those emails
were written should make much of those signs self evident.
But still let me mention a few things

First,notice how the first email started.It started by addressing
me with "To whom it may concern".It was an exaggerated attempt
to hide that they know anything about my identity through the
big guy they were serving who knew my identity since the email
complaint I sent regarding a stock he was working in 2006(BITS).
They moved far in their attempt to show that they have no knowledge
about me beyond what I provided about myself in the complaint
form I filled where I gave only my email address.

Notice also how when I said that I cant trust things even from
the SEC unless I see them firmly established they immediately
responded with email that was carbon copied to two other recipients
with emails containing @sec.gov to show me that the thing is firmly
established.

In addition I don't know what was unclear in my complaint.
Someone sold fake shares of vkng then he kept them in the
system with the help of also fake buyback claim by an entity
who sold some of their shares earlier.That way the stock
was driven low and kept low.Then shares were issued at these
low prices by the company to a financier according to a financing
deal signed on 1/7/10 in what most probably was part of the
plan.

They claimed they have only one of my complaints regarding
this issue although I sent about five.

Since I had that requested phone meeting and to this moment
and I still don't know what information they needed to conduct
an investigation that made it "imperative" to speak to me according
to their claim.

I also still cant find why the phone was chosen as the communication
medium for whatever they wanted to ask instead of Emails for example.
The answer to these questions is simple.They were checking things
and searching for information for the big guy and in direct conversation
there is usually a bigger chance for making one slip or reveal things with
much less care than through other communication means like emails.

When I asked them about possible trading restrictions on me resulting
from having this conversation with them they responded with "Additionally,
contacting the SEC does not restrict you from trading in Midsummer's stock".
I asked about restrictions on trading "the stock" and he responded about
"Midsummer's stock".If he was really interested in my complaint and paid
attention to it,he probably would have used either "the stock" or "vkng"
or spoke in general form by saying "Midsummer's stockS".But this sound
to be the response of someone who only paid attention to only things
sufficient to his participation in this plan.

Also during that phone meeting one of them asked how I know that the
selling was naked shorting.I responded by pointing out to the SHO list
which he could not recognize although it is one of the pillars of my
complaint.I had to even suggest to him searching for "SHO list" in
google.If he was really interested in investigating my complaint he
should have already known that since -again- it is one of the main
points in my complaint.

At the beginning of that meeting they said that my complaint is
not clear.But at the end the same guy said that they know what
I mean about what I see as the obvious connection between the
naked shorting and the claimed buy back.

Yes I see the connection as very clear and unavoidable.And if
one extend that to the party who signed the financing deal on
1/7/10 things will look complete and clearer.But I still cant
understand the technicality of it probably because I am not
professional.Nevertheless they did not ask any question about
that.So if they have no question about that then what is left
as ambiguous in my complaint?

Also during the same conversation I asked if they read the
Midsummer's explanation in the claimed buyback filings.One
of them responded that they wont say what they read or did
not read.It was -again- a ridiculous exaggeration to show that
they are doing a professional work since that part -whether directly
mentioned or not-is also part of the pillars of my complaint.

These are some of the things I wanted to highlight although
the whole thing and their real intention is very clear,anyway.

Some back and forth emails with that SEC office

"To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing in reference to your complaint which was received by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2010. My colleagues and I are interested in setting up a telephonic meeting with you to further discuss your complaint. As such, we would appreciate if you would provide your contact information, and a date and time that you will be available to speak with us. Please feel free to contact me at the above email address or the below listed number. Thank You."

First I sent an accepting response then I sent this by the end of the day

"Because of some unexpected event I think that I wont be available

these next few days.I will contact you when ready.
I appreciate your attention to my complaint."

To that they responded with this

"Can you please let me know how soon you will be available for a meeting? We would like to proceed with your complaint but it is imperative that we speak with you first. Thanks."

To that I responded with this:

"But according to the SEC information,they cannot

"disclose the existence or non-existence of an investigation
and any information gathered unless made a matter of public
record in proceedings brought before the SEC or in the courts"
Isn't you contacting me considered a disclosure for existence
of an investigation without being first disclosed in public records?
Wouldn't I be having information unavailable to other investors because
of this contact?How much and how long having such information would
restrict me from trading the stock?
In addition,I wont disclose in any such contact if it happens
any more information other than what I am ready to disclose publicly
to everybody else.
Don't get me wrong.I am very eager to see my complaint being
investigated.But history lessons taught me to be -frankly
speaking- suspicious even with what may come from the SEC
staff unless I see firmly established things."

To that someone else responded and CCed the one who was
my main contact until that time in addition to another person.
All their emails ended with "@SEC.GOV":

"Mr. XXXXX
Thank you for sending us your complaint and agreeing to speak with us. Please understand that us contacting you does not mean that we are undertaking an examination of Midsummer Capital. Rather, our purpose for contacting you is to get a better understanding of the complaint that you submitted to the SEC. Our conversation also does not necessarily constitute the SEC beginning an examination of Midsummer Capital. Additionally, contacting the SEC does not restrict you from trading in Midsummer's stock. If you have any further concerns, please let me know. We look forward to our conversation with you."

Two kinds of claim

Those who cant sort things for themselves need

to notice two kinds of claim in my post about my
phone meeting with the SEC office in New York.
One is an opinion no matter how confident I am
in it.The other is being a witness to some event
with all the possible consequences if I am proved
to be lying and the event didn't really occur.

I could have pointed out a million


contradiction between what they claimed to be

their intention and their actions and another

million things showing how their real intention

is to help the main big guy here.



I don't know if that should make me happy because

one would have easier time discovering the corruption

or sad because even if they want to be honest we are

supposed to depend on the intelligence of such examples

to solve our complaints?



I don't have a suspicion about their real intention

anymore.I am confident of it.Although my suspicion

was already very close to the confidence stage.



Their trick did not last one day on me.Although

the first thing I thought about was that the

email address ending with @sec.gov in the first

email I received from them could be an old email

address and the manipulator had someone inside

who can use it without being noticed by others.

That is because I couldn't even imagine such level

of corruption.But to my surprise the investor

advocacy office at the SEC confirmed the name in that

email as someone working in SEC new york

office.They also confirmed the phone number in

that email which I used later to confirm the identity

of that person.Beside other sources,I called

the number of the SEC new york office mentioned

on the SEC web site and they confirmed all

three names I received (with them I also received

three email addresses ending in @sec.gov)as part of

the SEC office there.



If my complaint was referred to this SEC

office then I don't even know what to say.

LONG LIVE CORRUPTION!!!

On Friday I had a phone meeting with the SEC office in New York related

to vkng story based on their request.

And guess what?I feel confident that their intention was to extract some information
from me to help the big manipulator here and not to really solve the case.In other words
that part of the SEC was acting in service of the big guy here.Such level of corruption was
a very far fetched thought to me before this.

I had this opinion about their intention of  that contact since this Tuesday when they
emailed me asking for a phone meeting.I emailed and phoned many parties including
 investors advocacy at the SEC and the SEC new York office itself to make sure they
 work there and the answer was affirmative.Yet,I still had very high probability that
their intention is to help the big guy here not the other way around.In spite of that I
 agreed to that phone meeting and now even the very low possibility of being wrong
 in that has diminished even further.

VKNG:MANIPULATION AND DEFRAUDING CROSSING THE LAST LINE.

The story of VKNG involves the most outrageous fraud I have
ever seen in the market.The fraud I am talking about here is
not in the stock itself.Instead this fraud is related to the activities
surrounding the stock.

It seems that after the stock slipped out of control of someone
who intentionally was trying to keep it low to even beneath a penny
and keep individual investors away until some desired time in the future,
that someone refused to accept the reality of that situation.What he
did instead is that he started his naked shorting activities and the
stock remained on the SHO list from 11/13/09 to 01/04/10 continuously.
ftp://ftp.nasdaqtrader.com/symboldirectory/regsho

During that same time a big shareholder (Midsummer Investment
Limited) filed a group of filings claiming the buying back of shares they
sold when the stock was moving up and filed for that selling on the
16 of November.The buyback filings happened on the 14,15,17
and 18 of December 2009 and claimed the buying back of all
2428000 shares they sold earlier.That buyback couldn't sound
more fake than it did.

Shares were very scarce,yet there were not any sign of an attempt
for buying shares to be delivered to the naked positions.Instead the
price kept going lower and lower.

All that left the following conclusion unavoidable.The shares buyback
claim was just a trick to make the fake shares sold during the naked
shorting attack stay in the system and treated as real shares.

But wait..there is more..

The company was in need for some financing for its new project.
So it appears that to complete the trick ,on 01/07/2010  Dutchess
Opportunity Fund,II, LP.signed  a very special financing deal with
the company  allowing it to sell at unknown future market prices.But
the deal put a condition of effective registration before the company can
 use that financing.

While the first part of the trick did not need any support to be seen
clearly,nevertheless with the later part we seem to have a complete
plan.Now everything around seems to fit in an appropriate place and
make strong connections with other things.

The plan is simply to sell fake shares to drive the price lower.Then keep
those fake shares in the system with the help of that shares buy back
claim.Then keep the price low and wait for you or your partner who
singed that financing deal to receive shares at theses low prices.

Until the end of April we were defrauded of about 4.4 million shares
and more could be sold after that or on their way to be sold.