His Majesty The Psychotic

The whole world came to the service of this vkng psychotic
and granting him his wish to deny an event that has
no big effect on him other than to show he is not
always in control.Unfortunately,that also include
me.Although My mistake doesn't involve the legal
violations for which he is currently holding his
own friends as hostages just to satisfy that psychotic
need.

Everything connect very strongly to make one picture
and only one and it is of that psychotic need for
denial as the reason for this guy action here.
The guy needs to be controlled and restricted by
the outside because his psychotic wish is not allowing
him to control himself.The last position this guy need
to be in here is of the one calling the shots even if for
nothing more than his own safety.

A response to one of vkng manipulator "bashing" posts

Believe it or not that is still less agitating
to me than when you put your conditions for
the stock to move up.In fact I sometimes even
get close to wishing that we do not receive
anything that satisfy your condition and in
turn satisfy your delusional control over reality.
But I try to resist that since we should not damage
ourselves just to oppose your psychotic behavior.
The mistake was allowing you the opportunity to do
and continue this fraud from the beginning.But one
thing you should know is that you did not succeed
in doing that through your price temptation.No,you
deceived me with your psychotic way.You showed need
and humility which mislead one to think that it
contradict arrogance against reality.But the fact
is that it is the need to maintain a psychotic
arrogance against something in reality that pushed
for such need and desperation.Someone not psychotic
might think the need side might defeat the purpose
of the arrogant side.The psychotic person,on the other
hand,is very capable of this separation and act as if
he deals with two separate worlds or realities

I like how things work with that "Affiliate"

It remind me of how things work in a cartoon.
So just like when in the cartoon one run past a cliff
but doesn't fall until he look down and see the space
below him,that "affiliate" was allowed to sell (according
to the claim) until he noticed his being affiliate.

Let those helping VKNG defrauder remember this:

A car could be driven by one person.But when it makes
an accident it would make it to everyone inside.

Just something to consider while they let this drunk
driver lead their vehicle here.

Their Cat Can Quack

Also from the recent 10Q

"It is our understanding that, upon notice from

us to sell shares to Dutchess under the
Investment Agreement, Dutchess begins selling
shares in the open market and does not
typically hold the shares purchased from us."

So they expected it to quack but still thought
of it as a cat?

This kind of understanding does not fit even
the shortest term traders.It fits only someone
who is just acting as a medium to transfer
shares.In other words part in the already
known plan here.

That Big Dead Animal

Actually I wouldn't be surprised if it was
Midsummer who asked or suggested directly
or indirectly for insiders to write and defend
them.The main manipulator tried to use the
trust one generally assume in the SEC before
this.So it is not quite a stretch to think
the same method might be attempted through
the company this time.

I am not saying this just because it is a
possibility.Instead,there were somewhat
suspicious things like that forced grouping
of an insider (Bopp) and Midsummer in
the same paragraph.It sounded as if someone
wanted to defend Midsummer by associating them
with the insiders (real ones not SEC insiders)
so that our faith in them spread to Midsummer.

In any case,anyone try to fight for Midsummer
in the debate and argument field is fighting
a losing battle and I think I still can show
the picture better and better.

It is my words against the main manipulator's
financial power.So while I may not be able to
cause the SEC to abandon its corruption sufficiently
enough to really act on this case,his financial power
has no value in the debate and argument field.

There is a big dead animal here and whoever cant
smell that need his nose checked by a professional.
We sensed the stink long time ago and declared that
then gave extra time of more than 100 days for the
manipulator but he refused to abandon his plan although
he saw his violation being a public knowledge.

Not Just Spineless But We Can Write Trash As Well!

That  seems to be what the company is saying through
its action about this matter when they talked about it
in their recent filing:

"Midsummer Investment, Ltd invested in us prior to the January 2008 recapitalization and made an additional investment in connection with our recapitalization. As a result of those investments, as of December 24, 2009, based on a Schedule 13G filed by Midsummer with the SEC on December 24, 2009, Midsummer holds 8,344,619 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 5,551,034 shares at $0.18 per share. In November 2009, Midsummer had reported in filings with the SEC that they sold 2,289,417 shares of our common stock. As further reported in Forms 4 filed by Midsummer with the SEC in December 2009, due to volume limitations on selling restricted securities held by affiliates, Midsummer’s broker was required to repurchase the majority of these shares and restore them to Midsummer’s account. The repurchased shares are part of the total of 8,344,619 as reported. As of July 31, 2010, Midsummer has not made any additional filings with the SEC regarding their ownership of our equity securities and we therefore believe they continue to hold the same number of shares and warrants as reported in December 2009.


The common stock and related warrants owned by both (a name we do not need here) and Midsummer are not registered for resale with the SEC. Due to this, combined with each party’s affiliate status, both parties are currently limited in their ability to sell our common stock into the market to 1 percent of the outstanding common stock during any 90 day period. For example, one percent of the 53,772,055 shares outstanding as of July 31, 2010 would be 537,720 shares per 90 day period...Midsummer, in our opinion, is an affiliate solely because of the size of its holding. As of the date of this filing, Midsummer has no current relationship with the Company other than as an arm’s-length investor. "


Lets start first by saying they did not even get
the numbers right.The number of shares sold by
Midsummer was 2428000 not "2,289,417".Second,they
reported buying back all of them and not "the majority
of these shares".They did not even get that right.
One could go back to the selling and buyback filings
and add the numbers himself.

In addition how come they were allowed to sell
shares in excess of the allowed amount according
to that "affiliates" restriction to begin with?That just
added another question here instead of an answer.

And if that "affiliates" restriction was the reason
for the buyback then why did they claim buying back
even the amount of shares they were allowed to sell
according to that restriction?

Who agreed to sell them that amount of shares
at that time?Where and when did the related
transactions happened?How much did they pay
for them?

If finding someone willing to let go of his
shares at that time was that easy,why did the
stock was sold with naked shorting because of
a lack of available shares for borrowing and
remained all that time on the SHO list?

The contradictions are filling the room here.

There are also many things which could fit
that their selling really happened but there
is none for their claimed buyback.
Moreover,the stock remained on the SHO list
for a long time then exitted without any noticeable
buying of shares to be delivered.So,one could believe
in that buying back and he would need to explain it
in addition to explaining that SHO list thing.He
would end up with two unexplainable things.Or one
can combine its being fake with that SHO list
thing and end up with zero things to explain.

So in short,believing in that buyback would
leave so many scattered unanswered questions
while not attempting to deny how fake it sounded
answers those questions and shows a connected
picture.That would become especially true when one
extends his vision to the complete thing including
the signed financing deal and attempt to see the
whole picture and how things would fit altogether
there.

Finally I say here the same thing I wrote to the
SEC.This buyback filing is one the biggest filing
jokes the SEC has ever received.Yet they insisted
on continuing to abuse us with that defrauding trick
in spite of giving them months and months of time.
They might have filled the gap with real shares
from Dutchess (directly or indirectly) by now but
I think there is still a big probability that tracing
that those shares came much later than when they
claimed that buyback is an attainable task.

Going after the crime or the gang?

While I am still at the beginning of my attempt to cause

the SEC to be at least not as corrupt and shameless to

a level of not reacting to the clear outrageous fraud

that happened here,there is a related dimension I haven't

entered yet.That dimension concerns the cooperation with

the one who singed the financing deal with the company

but goes beyond this case.That is because there are many

similar deals signed by that same entity with other companies

and the thought of unholy alliance with the main manipulator

of vkng is unavoidable.That alliance consist of one partner

enticing companies by financing deals that allow them to sell

at future unknown prices whenever they want and as much

as they want while the other partner maintain the pressure

on the price inside the market and  create fakely inflated volume

(which permits the selling of more shares by the company) whenever

 he wants.

Clearly we seem to have a gang here and not just a crime.